About
A generalist advisory practice built on innovation funding, technology assessment, business development, financial reasoning, and practical project evaluation experience.
Generalist by design. Structured by experience.
I work across the intersection of technology, grants, markets, execution, and financing logic. The role is not only to support applications, but to help shape innovation projects into clear, credible, and fundable propositions.
This perspective comes from public R&D project assessment, EU innovation funding work, business development, financial analysis, technology review, and company-level market intelligence.
183 projects
Innovation and R&D projects reviewed, assessed, or supported across public funding and advisory contexts.
TRL 2–TRL 9
Experience from early concept validation to near-market development and scale-up readiness.
Grant-Based Funding
Practical background in competitive grant preparation, eligibility logic, proposal structure, and funding fit.
How I think about projects
A strong innovation project is not built on novelty alone. It needs technical substance, market relevance, execution capacity, financial realism, and a proposal narrative that evaluators can follow.
Is the project understandable, evidence-based, feasible, and aligned with what a funding body is likely to reward?
Does the project connect to a real need, adoption pathway, and realistic business model?
Grant strategy is considered together with funding needs, risk, incentives, dilution, and long-term value creation.
A good proposal must translate ambition into work packages, roles, milestones, risks, and measurable outcomes.
Experience base
The value is in connecting fields that are often treated separately: technology, grant logic, market demand, financial realism, and execution capacity.
Professional background
A practical profile combining public innovation assessment, EU funding work, business development, and financial analysis.
Why the generalist view matters
Innovation funding decisions are rarely based on one factor. The strongest projects combine technical depth, credible market logic, realistic resources, implementation discipline, and a clear evaluator-facing narrative.
Need a structured view on your innovation project?
Start with a focused discussion on grant fit, project readiness, and possible next steps.
